Skip to content

Doc update2 #143

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 29, 2025
Merged

Doc update2 #143

merged 8 commits into from
May 29, 2025

Conversation

ebariaux
Copy link
Contributor

Mostly fixes for typos and broken links

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Implementation status of compiler and language features in Embedded Swift, compa
| Metatypes | No, currently only allowed as unused arguments (type hints) |
| Untyped throwing | No, intentionally unsupported long-term (typed throwing should be used instead) |
| Weak references, unowned references | No |
| Non-final generic class methods | No, intentionally unsupported long-term, see <[Embedded Swift -- Non-final generic methods](NonFinalGenericMethods.md)>|
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we use a docc style link here?

@@ -27,4 +27,4 @@ Note that there are no behavior changes in Embedded Swift compared to full Swift

## Further resources

The above lists are describing features that are removed from Embedded Swift *by design*. Since Embedded Swift is currently an experimental preview, there might also be features that are not yet implemented. See the in-development status at [Embedded Swift -- Status](EmbeddedSwiftStatus.md).
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same note about docc style link

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I kept the same link type as before, just fixing the name so it points to the right place.
I checked if I could specify a name when using the <doc: > construct but did not find anything in the doc.
I believe in the name would automatically be the name of the target document, which I'm fine with.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did change the link, it indeed looks cleaner

@rauhul rauhul merged commit 058db82 into apple:doc-update2 May 29, 2025
@kubamracek
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks, @ebariaux, these are all great changes!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants