Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Support DuckDB struct syntax and support list of struct syntax #1372
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support DuckDB struct syntax and support list of struct syntax #1372
Changes from 6 commits
6b7ac54
ef3da33
d26444d
93d9245
ea04755
3dca179
fe715d7
4638137
96e3164
f3a6cd8
6e25767
6947c15
7bf5b68
d898230
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh this looks like a bug for us to silently drop the returned flag since there might be an extraneous
>
, seems like we would instead do something like thisThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not sure I follow if/why this test is needed, since bigquery doesn't support
[]
syntax for arrays?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh I think this is incorrect, no need for the input and output to not match, in this case the output is significantly different syntax from what went into the parser. We can probably add a
parens_delimeter: bool
or similar flag to the StructField struct so that it knows how to display accordingly?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is not clear to me. Do you mean adding flag so we have different canonical name for
struct<>
andstruct()
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yeah that's what I meant - my bad realised I wrote
comma_delimeter
but meant to writeparens_delimeter
instead. Yeah so like if that flag is true display usesstruct (...)
otherwisestruct<...>