This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 12, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27.4k
Fix #6128 and #8150 #8154
Closed
Closed
Fix #6128 and #8150 #8154
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is not right. toJSON doesn't have to return a string value, but we always need a string value, that's why we are doing this serialization.
how about we special case date instead? instead of your
isDefined
check on line 933 doisDate
.Are there other scenarios besides dates where toJSON doesn't do the right thing?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @IgorMinar , thanks for taking the time to review this PR.
As per my comments in issue #8150, I had initially taken the approach of special casing date as per below:
I then came across a similar older issue #6128 and I then thought that perhaps the .toJSON method would be a more robust approach.
I don't actually know of any scenarios, so I'd be happy to revert to the isDate approach.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20734894/difference-between-tojson-and-json-stringify
It looks like special casing isDate is the correct approach - I'll submit a new commit.