This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 12, 2024. It is now read-only.
fix($resource): append extra params even if Object.prototype
has properties with the same name
#14867
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Bug fix
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
If
Object.prototype
has a property namedxyz
, then an extraxyz
param passed to a$resource
action call, does not get passed to$http
(inconfig.params
).See #14866.
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
If
Object.prototype
has a property namedxyz
, then an extraxyz
param passed to a$resource
action call, does get passed to$http
(inconfig.params
).Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Possibly. If someone relied on using a
params
object with own, enumerable properties that have the same names with properties onObject.prototype
and not have these properties passed to$http
(and included in the URL as query params), then this would break them. Highly unlikely though.Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)Other information:
Fixes #14866