Component router guide

[petebacondarwin]

• What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

docs update!

• Other information:

So this is still a draft but it could be good enough to merge and iterate on.
The big problem is that, at the moment, I had to include the whole of the router code in the runnable example.

You can see a demo of the guide here: https://ci.angularjs.org/job/angular.js-pete/1073/artifact/build/docs/guide/component-router

[googlebot]

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request) and all commit authors, but as best as we can tell these commits were authored by someone else. If that's the case, please add them to this pull request and have them confirm that they're okay with these commits being contributed to Google. If we're mistaken and you did author these commits, just reply here to confirm.

[googlebot]

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request) and all commit authors, but as best as we can tell these commits were authored by someone else. If that's the case, please add them to this pull request and have them confirm that they're okay with these commits being contributed to Google. If we're mistaken and you did author these commits, just reply here to confirm.

[googlebot]

CLAs look good, thanks!

[googlebot]

CLAs look good, thanks!

[gkalpak]

Looks good overall (there are a few typis here and there, but the diff is not displayed to comment 😞)

It might be better to remove the Crisis Center bits from the example, since it's not mentioned in the guide. (Maybe provide the whole app (with Crisis Center) at the end as a more complete example.

Regarding including the whole router code in the example, it's ugly, but I can live with it as a temporary work-around.
When the issue with v0.2.x being marked as pre-release (instead of latest) is resolved, we could use https://npmcdn.org maybe

[brandonroberts]

The sample code used here for configuring routes and the ngLink is incorrect.

[petebacondarwin]

Yes - work in progress :-)

[btford]

FYI I published @angular/router v0.2.0 from master– you should be able to use that now.

[petebacondarwin]

Yes!

[petebacondarwin]

npmcdn doesn't seem to cope with the scoped package @angular/router

[gkalpak]

I can see the files just fine (e.g. angular_1_router.js).