This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 12, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27.4k
feat($http): add XHR events configuration option #11547
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -1683,6 +1683,17 @@ function MockXhr() { | |
}; | ||
|
||
this.abort = angular.noop; | ||
|
||
this.$$events = {}; | ||
this.addEventListener = function(name, listener) { | ||
if (angular.isUndefined(this.$$events[name])) this.$$events[name] = []; | ||
this.$$events[name].push(listener); | ||
}; | ||
|
||
this.upload = { | ||
$$events: {}, | ||
addEventListener: this.addEventListener | ||
}; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Since we are mocking the addition of event listeners, would it make sense to also mock emitting some event (so that people can test their code once it relies on a callback to be called on event X) ? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That makes sense and could be implemented like MockWindow's fire method . |
||
} | ||
|
||
|
||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why put listeners inside
upload
if it's not going to make any difference ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
?
The
eventHandlers
object has the following structure:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, but we end up doing
xhr.addEventListener(key, value)
for all of them.I.e. I could write you example as:
and the result would be the same.
So, I am wondering if there is any benefit in separating into two categories. Why not keep it flat ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, this is a typo on my part. This is meant to attach events on
xhr.upload
. The line 100 should readxhr.upload.addEventListener(key, value);
.I'll be very happy to fix this if there's any interest in the PR.
Specifically, this is because there's
progress
events for both upload and the xhr object itself.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense now; I didn't know about
xhr.upload
😕