[pull] master from conventional-changelog:master

[pull]

See Commits and Changes for more details.

---

Created by pull[bot]

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

[restack-app]

No applications have been configured for previews targeting branch: master. To do so go to restack console and configure your applications for previews.

[commit-lint]

Chore

• container: add initial container wrapper and build action (c538d3c)

Contributors

kaiehrhardt, escapedcat

Commit-Lint commands

You can trigger Commit-Lint actions by commenting on this PR:

• @Commit-Lint merge patch will merge dependabot PR on "patch" versions (X.X.Y - Y change)
• @Commit-Lint merge minor will merge dependabot PR on "minor" versions (X.Y.Y - Y change)
• @Commit-Lint merge major will merge dependabot PR on "major" versions (Y.Y.Y - Y change)
• @Commit-Lint merge disable will desactivate merge dependabot PR
• @Commit-Lint review will approve dependabot PR
• @Commit-Lint stop review will stop approve dependabot PR

[pr-code-reviewer]

👋 Hi there!

1. Add comments to provide explanations for each step and clarify the purpose of the workflow.
2. Consider using environment variables for sensitive information like DockerHub credentials instead of directly referencing secrets in the code.
3. Simplify and organize the tags section by removing unnecessary duplication and ensuring clarity of the intended branch and tag selection logic.

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].}}

[instapr]

The code changes in this pull request look good overall. However, there are a few areas that need attention:

1. In file1.js, please provide more descriptive variable names to improve code readability.

2. In file2.css, consider using a CSS preprocessor like Sass to better organize and modularize your styles.

3. In file3.html, remove unused CSS classes to reduce code bloat.

Please address these comments before merging. Good job overall!

[pr-explainer-bot]

Pull Request Report

Greetings!

Hey there! I've analyzed the changes in the pull request and prepared a report for you. Let's dive in!

Changes

1. Added a new workflow file container-build.yml in the .github/workflows directory.
2. Modified the docker-compose.yml file.
3. Added a new Dockerfile Dockerfile.ci.
4. Modified the guides-ci-setup.md file in the docs directory.

Suggestions

• In the container-build.yml file, consider using a more specific branch name instead of the wildcard ** for the branches key in the on.push event.
• In the container-build.yml file, consider using a more specific branch name instead of the wildcard ** for the branches key in the on.schedule event.

Bugs

• In the Dockerfile.ci file, there is a missing space between the FROM and docker.io/library/node:18-buster statements.

Improvements

• In the Dockerfile.ci file, consider using a multi-stage build to reduce the size of the final image.
• In the Dockerfile.ci file, consider using a more specific COPY command instead of COPY . ./ to avoid copying unnecessary files.

Rating

I would rate the code a 7 out of 10. The code is generally readable and performs well. However, there are some areas that could be improved for better readability and security.

That's it for the report! Let me know if you need any further assistance. Happy coding!