-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Example should be renamed to include simpletest #12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
In this case, the examples are really not "simple tests" they are used to load code to the esp32 module. A user should not run this to "see how it works". Is "simpletest" really the appropriate name? |
@jerryneedell Perhaps not. I guessed. What would be considered a simpletest for this library? |
I'm not sure there really is one. It would be like having a simpletest for a .uf2 file. If you run it , it will write the file to your board. |
Fair enough. Closing this issue. I think we should consider figuring out what would be considered a simpletest for this lib though, if at all possible. |
perhaps @brentru would have some ideas -- this may fit into his guide for the esp32spi... |
Example
miniesptool_esp32multifile.py
should be renamed tominiesptool_esp32multifile_simpletest.py
to fit with CircuitPython library standards.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: