Made changes to bring library closer to cookiecutter

[evaherrada]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

👋 Thanks for this pull request! Unfortunately, it looks like the automated continuous integration (CI) test(s) failed. These can be tricky to fix so we've written a guide on how to fix them locally. It has pages about running pre-commit locally and another about building the docs locally with sphinx. Thanks for contributing to CircuitPython! If you have more questions, feel free to join the Adafruit Discord and post in #circuitpython-dev.

[dhalbert]

typing is a library from CPython, so I'm a little reluctant to rename the example to be typing. Does it need to match for other reasons?

[dhalbert]

Maybe this library should be called typing_circuitpython, and the repo named Adafruit_CircuitPython_Typing_CircuitPython?? That would get rid of the naming inconsistencies.

[evaherrada]

Just for adabot. However I could also make adabot be ok with examples following the format of: CircuitPython_LIBNAME_EXAMPLENAME.py

[dhalbert]

Maybe this library should be called typing_circuitpython, and the repo named Adafruit_CircuitPython_Typing_CircuitPython?? That would get rid of the naming inconsistencies.

I'm willing to keep having the example renamed and make renaming the library a long-term issue.

[evaherrada]

Yeah that could work, although I personally would want to avoid that as I think it doesn't look great, but I understand why it would make sense to do