Skip to content

Fix travis URLs #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2018
Merged

Fix travis URLs #2

merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2018

Conversation

tannewt
Copy link
Member

@tannewt tannewt commented May 1, 2018

No description provided.

@tannewt tannewt requested a review from jerryneedell May 1, 2018 18:28
Copy link
Contributor

@jerryneedell jerryneedell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oops - sorry I missed that one.

@tannewt tannewt merged commit 1905220 into master May 1, 2018
@tannewt
Copy link
Member Author

tannewt commented May 1, 2018 via email

tannewt pushed a commit to adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_Bundle that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2018
Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_RFM69 to 1.1.3 from 1.1.1:
  > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_RFM69#8 from jerryneedell/jerryn_fixpylint
  > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_RFM69#7 from jerryneedell/jerryn_fix_freq

Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_STMPE610 to 1.0.1 from 0.8.0:
  > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_STMPE610#5 from jerryneedell/jerryn_fixpylint
  > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_STMPE610#4 from jerryneedell/jerryn_fixspi
  > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_STMPE610#2 from adafruit/tannewt-patch-1
@evaherrada evaherrada deleted the tannewt-patch-1 branch June 21, 2021 13:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants