Skip to content

unable to access Samsung EVO Plus microSDHC UHS-I card 32G from PyPortal with CircuitPy and adafruit_sdcard library #15

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
ddigioia2 opened this issue Apr 11, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@ddigioia2
Copy link

Any help is appreciated, and please let me know if you need any more details.
Unfortunately, this is currently the only microSD card I have.
I also reformatted the card (full, slow format) with the official app from https://www.sdcard.org/downloads/formatter/

Thanks.
David

Using mu-editor serial console:

Adafruit CircuitPython 4.0.0-beta.6 on 2019-03-30; Adafruit PyPortal with samd51j20
import board
import busio
import digitalio
spi = busio.SPI(board.SCK, MOSI=board.MOSI, MISO=board.MISO)
cs = digitalio.DigitalInOut(board.SD_CS)
import adafruit_sdcard
import storage
sdcard = adafruit_sdcard.SDCard(spi, cs)

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "adafruit_sdcard.py", line 113, in init
File "adafruit_sdcard.py", line 147, in _init_card
File "adafruit_sdcard.py", line 203, in _init_card_v2
OSError: timeout waiting for v2 card

@kattni
Copy link
Contributor

kattni commented Apr 11, 2019

This is a duplicate of #13. This is a known issue - there is no ETA on a fix. Please feel free to add more information to issue #13, however I am closing this issue in favor of the original.

@kattni kattni closed this as completed Apr 11, 2019
@dhalbert
Copy link
Contributor

This was a followup I requested from this thread: https://forums.adafruit.com/viewtopic.php?f=60&t=149712

@kattni kattni reopened this Apr 11, 2019
@kattni
Copy link
Contributor

kattni commented Apr 11, 2019

Understood. Both issues now reference each other, that is sufficient.

@dhalbert
Copy link
Contributor

We believe #20 fixes this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants