Skip to content

Better reuse of objects with Adafruit IO #26

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2021

Conversation

makermelissa
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@makermelissa makermelissa requested a review from a team April 2, 2021 22:11
@makermelissa makermelissa changed the title Better reuse of object with Adafruit IO Better reuse of objects with Adafruit IO Apr 2, 2021
@makermelissa makermelissa merged commit dea295b into adafruit:main Apr 2, 2021
adafruit-adabot added a commit to adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_Bundle that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2021
Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_SI5351 to 1.2.7 from 1.2.6:
  > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_SI5351#19 from thefloe1/master
  > "Increase duplicate code check threshold "

Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_MiniMQTT to 5.0.6 from 5.0.5:
  > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_MiniMQTT#80 from makermelissa/master
  > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_MiniMQTT#78 from brentru/validate-port
  > "Increase duplicate code check threshold "

Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_PortalBase to 1.5.1 from 1.4.1:
  > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_PortalBase#27 from makermelissa/main
  > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_PortalBase#26 from makermelissa/main
  > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_PortalBase#25 from makermelissa/main
  > "Increase duplicate code check threshold "
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants