Skip to content

fix(quantum): Correct simulator deprecation #7869

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2022

Conversation

CaedenPH
Copy link
Contributor

Describe your change:

Fixes the qasm_simulator deprecation

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms include at least one URL that points to Wikipedia or another similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 30, 2022
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 30, 2022
@cclauss cclauss merged commit 48a73a2 into TheAlgorithms:master Oct 30, 2022
@CaedenPH CaedenPH deleted the patch-1 branch October 30, 2022 10:11
@cclauss
Copy link
Member

cclauss commented Oct 30, 2022

If you get some time today, please go thru the open PRs that are not on hold and leave me a list of those that you think are most worthy of a review.

@CaedenPH
Copy link
Contributor Author

CaedenPH commented Oct 30, 2022

I'll ping you on each one if that's okay

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement This PR modified some existing files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants