Skip to content

Script Output: The entire longest increasing subsequence instead of it's length #74

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 10, 2017
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
53 changes: 41 additions & 12 deletions dynamic_programming/longest_increasing_subsequence.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,12 +1,41 @@
"""
The Longest Increasing Subsequence (LIS) problem is to find the length of the longest subsequence of a given sequence such that all elements of the subsequence are sorted in increasing order. For example, the length of LIS for {10, 22, 9, 33, 21, 50, 41, 60, 80} is 6
"""
def LIS(arr):
n= len(arr)
lis = [1]*n

for i in range(1, n):
for j in range(0, i):
if arr[i] > arr[j] and lis[i] <= lis[j]:
lis[i] = lis[j] + 1
return max(lis)
'''
Author : Mehdi ALAOUI

This is a pure Python implementation of Dynamic Programming solution to the longest increasing subsequence of a given sequence.

The problem is :
Given an ARRAY, to find the longest and increasing sub ARRAY in that given ARRAY and return it.
Example: [10, 22, 9, 33, 21, 50, 41, 60, 80] as input will return [10, 22, 33, 41, 60, 80] as output
'''
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please mention time and space complexity of the code

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just finished some optimizations on complexity, it was, on the worst case O(2^(n-1)), but now, I think that in the worst case, it's O(nlog(n)), if I'm wrong, please correct me.


def longestSub(ARRAY): #This function is recursive

ARRAY_LENGTH = len(ARRAY)
if(ARRAY_LENGTH <= 1): #If the array contains only one element, we return it (it's the stop condition of recursion)
return ARRAY
#Else
PIVOT=ARRAY[0]
isFound=False
i=1
LONGEST_SUB=[]
while(not isFound and i<ARRAY_LENGTH):
if (ARRAY[i] < PIVOT):
isFound=True
TEMPORARY_ARRAY = [ element for element in ARRAY[i:] if element >= ARRAY[i] ]
TEMPORARY_ARRAY = longestSub(TEMPORARY_ARRAY)
if ( len(TEMPORARY_ARRAY) > len(LONGEST_SUB) ):
LONGEST_SUB = TEMPORARY_ARRAY
else:
i+=1

TEMPORARY_ARRAY = [ element for element in ARRAY[1:] if element >= PIVOT ]
TEMPORARY_ARRAY = [PIVOT] + longestSub(TEMPORARY_ARRAY)
if ( len(TEMPORARY_ARRAY) > len(LONGEST_SUB) ):
return TEMPORARY_ARRAY
else:
return LONGEST_SUB

#Some examples

print(longestSub([4,8,7,5,1,12,2,3,9]))
print(longestSub([9,8,7,6,5,7]))