Skip to content

Add Equal Loudness Filter #7019

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Oct 12, 2022
Merged

Add Equal Loudness Filter #7019

merged 11 commits into from
Oct 12, 2022

Conversation

Martmists-GH
Copy link
Contributor

@Martmists-GH Martmists-GH commented Oct 11, 2022

Describe your change:

Add an Equal Loudness Filter which aims to compensate for the human ear's non-linear response to sound. Based on the matlab implementation from hydrogenaudio (archive.org link)

Unfortunately the precommit hook really wants to format the frequencies and gains list in a very specific way, making it look awful.

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in its comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

Signed-off-by: Martmists <[email protected]>
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files require type hints https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 11, 2022
Copy link

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️

🔗 Relevant Links

Repository:

Python:

Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.

algorithms-keeper commands and options

algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:

  • @algorithms-keeper review to trigger the checks for only added pull request files
  • @algorithms-keeper review-all to trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.

NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the require type hints https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html label Oct 11, 2022
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added awaiting changes A maintainer has requested changes to this PR and removed awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 12, 2022
Signed-off-by: Martmists <[email protected]>
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed and removed awaiting changes A maintainer has requested changes to this PR labels Oct 12, 2022
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 12, 2022
@Martmists-GH
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cclauss I applied your suggestions, would you happen to know why it's not working?

Copy link

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️

🔗 Relevant Links

Repository:

Python:

Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.

algorithms-keeper commands and options

algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:

  • @algorithms-keeper review to trigger the checks for only added pull request files
  • @algorithms-keeper review-all to trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.

NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 12, 2022
Copy link
Member

@cclauss cclauss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Thanks for doing this.

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 12, 2022
@cclauss cclauss merged commit a04a636 into TheAlgorithms:master Oct 12, 2022
@cclauss
Copy link
Member

cclauss commented Dec 18, 2022

@Martmists-GH Can you please rename
audio_filters/equal_loudness_filter.py.broken.txt --> audio_filters/equal_loudness_filter.py
and fix the failing test?

@Martmists-GH
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm not sure why it's failing, it was working fine when merged. Could you provide the error it gives?

@cclauss
Copy link
Member

cclauss commented Dec 18, 2022

I bet it is a change in numpy...
https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/arrays.scalars.html#numpy.int_ with a trailing underscore.

=================================== FAILURES ===================================
__ [doctest] audio_filters.equal_loudness_filter.EqualLoudnessFilter.process ___
053 
054         Process a single sample through both filters
055 
056         >>> filt = EqualLoudnessFilter()
UNEXPECTED EXCEPTION: AttributeError("module 'numpy' has no attribute 'int'")
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.1/x64/lib/python3.11/doctest.py", line 1350, in __run
    exec(compile(example.source, filename, "single",
  File "<doctest audio_filters.equal_loudness_filter.EqualLoudnessFilter.process[0]>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/home/runner/work/Python/Python/audio_filters/equal_loudness_filter.py", line 49, in __init__
    ya, yb = yulewalk(10, freqs_normalized, gains_normalized)
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.1/x64/lib/python3.11/site-packages/yulewalker/yulewalker.py", line 153, in yulewalk
    j = np.arange(nb, ne).astype(np.int)
                                 ^^^^^^
  File "/opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.1/x64/lib/python3.11/site-packages/numpy/__init__.py", line 284, in __getattr__
    raise AttributeError("module {!r} has no attribute "
AttributeError: module 'numpy' has no attribute 'int'
/home/runner/work/Python/Python/audio_filters/equal_loudness_filter.py:56: UnexpectedException

@Martmists-GH
Copy link
Contributor Author

It looks like the yulewalker package is not compatible with the new numpy version for 3.11, and you should open an issue on their repository instead.

@cclauss
Copy link
Member

cclauss commented Dec 18, 2022

I think we did... mmxgn/yulewalker#5

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement This PR modified some existing files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants