Skip to content

For the better understanding of time taken. #6583

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 30, 2022

Conversation

samyakpagariya
Copy link
Contributor

@samyakpagariya samyakpagariya commented Oct 3, 2022

Describe your change:

In this change I have initialized a variable p with the value of (1e9+7) and then took the modulus of process time with it . This modification gives better time taken by the process . Firstly it was giving answer in the exponential now it gives in the integer form.

Fixed a small problem.

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in its comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

samyakpagariya and others added 2 commits October 3, 2022 10:41
In this change I have initialized a variable p with the value of (1e9+7) and then took the modulus of process time with it . This modification gives better time taken by the process . Firstly it was giving answer in the exponential now it gives in the integer form.
@samyakpagariya samyakpagariya marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2022 05:26
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added enhancement This PR modified some existing files awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed labels Oct 3, 2022
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2022
14 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@CaedenPH CaedenPH left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cclauss Looks good -

Co-authored-by: Caeden Perelli-Harris <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@cclauss cclauss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

RSLGTM

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot removed the awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed label Oct 30, 2022
@cclauss cclauss merged commit fcfe35c into TheAlgorithms:master Oct 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement This PR modified some existing files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants