Skip to content

Enter the logic for hash table #6497

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

silam
Copy link
Contributor

@silam silam commented Oct 1, 2022

Describe your change:

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in its comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed enhancement This PR modified some existing files labels Oct 1, 2022
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot added the tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass label Oct 2, 2022
@silam silam requested a review from CaedenPH October 2, 2022 13:52
@algorithms-keeper algorithms-keeper bot mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2022
14 tasks
@silam
Copy link
Contributor Author

silam commented Oct 3, 2022

How do I know what I did that I got label: tests are failing

@silam silam requested a review from CaedenPH October 3, 2022 11:20
@cclauss cclauss mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2022
14 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@CaedenPH CaedenPH left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cclauss This is good

is size of hash table.

Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_hashing#:~:text=Double%20hashing%20is%20a%20computer,data%20structure%20on%20a%20table%20.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change

@cclauss
Copy link
Member

cclauss commented Oct 30, 2022

Unfortunately two files changed in one pr.

@cclauss cclauss closed this Oct 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting reviews This PR is ready to be reviewed enhancement This PR modified some existing files tests are failing Do not merge until tests pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants