-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46.8k
Created triplet_sum in Python/other #2362
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Hey @Kush1101, TravisCI finished with status TravisBuddy Request Identifier: 94a8bd60-e90b-11ea-ae3c-2d16223a9f65 |
@cclauss Please review. |
OK... With this one we are going to write two different functions in the same file that solve the same problem and then we are going to write a timeit benchmark to tell us which one is faster. The second function should leverage the itertools module (combinations() or permutations()) and should pass the same doctests. |
Okk. Working on it |
I have written two functions, but I am still not sure about the proper way to include timeit in this code. def triplet_sum1(arr:List[int],X:int) ->tuple:
"""
Returns a triplet in in array with sum equal to X,
else (0, 0, 0).
>>> triplet_sum1([13, 29, 7, 23, 5], 35)
(5, 7, 23)
>>> triplet_sum1([37, 9, 19, 50, 44], 65)
(9, 19, 37)
>>> arr = [6, 47, 27, 1, 15]
>>> summ = 11
>>> triplet_sum1(arr,summ)
(0, 0, 0)
"""
triplets = list(permutations(arr,3))
for triplet in triplets:
if sum(triplet) == X:
return tuple(sorted(triplet))
return (0, 0, 0)
def triplet_sum2(arr: List[int], X: int) -> tuple:
"""
Returns a triplet in in array with sum equal to X,
else (0, 0, 0).
>>> triplet_sum2([13, 29, 7, 23, 5], 35)
(5, 7, 23)
>>> triplet_sum2([37, 9, 19, 50, 44], 65)
(9, 19, 37)
>>> arr = [6, 47, 27, 1, 15]
>>> summ = 11
>>> triplet_sum2(arr,summ)
(0, 0, 0)
"""
arr.sort()
n = len(arr)
for i in range(n - 1):
left, right = i + 1, n - 1
while left < right:
if arr[i] + arr[left] + arr[right] == X:
return (arr[i], arr[left], arr[right])
elif arr[i] + arr[left] + arr[right] < X:
left += 1
elif arr[i] + arr[left] + arr[right] > X:
right -= 1
else:
return (0, 0, 0) Now should I do it like this? """
"""
Given an array of integers and another integer X,
we are required to find a triplet from the array such that it's sum is equal to X
"""
from typing import List
from itertools import permutations
from timeit import repeat
def triplet_sum1(arr: List[int], X: int) -> tuple:
"""
Returns a triplet in in array with sum equal to X,
else (0, 0, 0).
>>> triplet_sum1([13, 29, 7, 23, 5], 35)
(5, 7, 23)
>>> triplet_sum1([37, 9, 19, 50, 44], 65)
(9, 19, 37)
>>> arr = [6, 47, 27, 1, 15]
>>> summ = 11
>>> triplet_sum1(arr,summ)
(0, 0, 0)
"""
triplets = list(permutations(arr, 3))
for triplet in triplets:
if sum(triplet) == X:
return tuple(sorted(triplet))
return (0, 0, 0)
def sol1_time():
setup_code = """
from __main__ import triplet_sum1
from random import randint"""
test_code = """
arr = [randint(-1000, 1000) for i in range(10)]
r = randint(-5000, 5000)
triplet_sum1(arr,r)
"""
times = repeat(stmt=test_code, setup=setup_code, repeat=5, number=10000)
return f"Naive solution time is {min(times)}"
def triplet_sum2(arr: List[int], X: int) -> tuple:
"""
Returns a triplet in in array with sum equal to X,
else (0, 0, 0).
>>> triplet_sum2([13, 29, 7, 23, 5], 35)
(5, 7, 23)
>>> triplet_sum2([37, 9, 19, 50, 44], 65)
(9, 19, 37)
>>> arr = [6, 47, 27, 1, 15]
>>> summ = 11
>>> triplet_sum2(arr,summ)
(0, 0, 0)
"""
arr.sort()
n = len(arr)
for i in range(n - 1):
left, right = i + 1, n - 1
while left < right:
if arr[i] + arr[left] + arr[right] == X:
return (arr[i], arr[left], arr[right])
elif arr[i] + arr[left] + arr[right] < X:
left += 1
elif arr[i] + arr[left] + arr[right] > X:
right -= 1
else:
return (0, 0, 0)
def sol2_time():
setup_code = """
from __main__ import triplet_sum2
from random import randint"""
test_code = """
arr = [randint(-1000, 1000) for i in range(10)]
r = randint(-5000, 5000)
triplet_sum2(arr,r)
"""
times = repeat(stmt=test_code, setup=setup_code, repeat=5, number=10000)
return f"Optimized solution time is {min(times)}"
if __name__ == "__main__":
from doctest import testmod
testmod()
from random import randint
arr = [randint(-1000, 1000) for i in range(100)]
r = randint(-5000, 5000)
print(f"{triplet_sum1(arr,r)}")
print(f"{sol1_time()}")
print(f"{triplet_sum2(arr,r)}")
print(f"{sol2_time()}") |
I made a PR, so it will be easier for you to review and propose changes. @cclauss |
Hey @Kush1101, TravisCI finished with status TravisBuddy Request Identifier: b60306c0-e918-11ea-ae3c-2d16223a9f65 |
Nice! A few trailing whitespaces to clean up. When benchmarking it is vital that both algorithms are tested with the exact same dataset so please do something like this... def make_dataset():
<your code here>
return arr, target
dataset = make_dataset()
...
from __main__ import dataset, triplet_sum1, triplet_sum2
...
triplet_sum1(*dataset)
...
triplet_sum2(*dataset) |
I will do it now. |
Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]>
Hey @Kush1101, TravisCI finished with status TravisBuddy Request Identifier: 99b5bed0-e928-11ea-ae3c-2d16223a9f65 |
Hey @Kush1101, TravisCI finished with status TravisBuddy Request Identifier: ea5d2d00-e928-11ea-ae3c-2d16223a9f65 |
I tried to incorporate all the proposed changes. Both the functions are now tested on the same dataset. I also made other small changes. Please review it now. @cclauss |
Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]>
This is very impressive. Nice work. This shows the power of an algorithm. The Python standard library gives us tools to express complex things simply -- triplet_sum1() short, tidy, and easy to reason about. However, it is no match of the specific algorithm in triplet_sum2() that is longer and more difficult to reason about but delivers correct answers in a fraction of the time. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
EXCELLENT!! The benchmark clearly shows the winner!
True. |
* Add files via upload * Update triplet_sum.py * Update triplet_sum.py * Update other/triplet_sum.py Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]> * Update other/triplet_sum.py Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]> * Update other/triplet_sum.py Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]> * Update other/triplet_sum.py Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]> * Update triplet_sum.py * Update other/triplet_sum.py Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]> * Update other/triplet_sum.py Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]> * Update other/triplet_sum.py Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]> * Update other/triplet_sum.py Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]> * Update other/triplet_sum.py Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <[email protected]>
Describe your change:
Checklist:
Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}
.