Skip to content

Add test for camel case algorithm #710

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

alvux
Copy link
Contributor

@alvux alvux commented Oct 2, 2021

Welcome to JavaScript community

Open in Gitpod know more

Describe your change:

The goal of this PR is to add tests for the CheckCamelCase algorithm. It also changes CheckCamelCase.js in order to respect Javascript ES6 standard

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?
  • Add tests

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new JavaScript files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames should use the UpperCamelCase (PascalCase) style. There should be no spaces in filenames.
    Example:UserProfile.js is allowed but userprofile.js,Userprofile.js,user-Profile.js,userProfile.js are not
  • All new algorithms have a URL in its comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

@pomkarnath98
Copy link
Member

@alvux, I think you hadn't created the CheckCamelCase.js file. Try to create test cases of your own file.

@raklaptudirm raklaptudirm merged commit 2ecee85 into TheAlgorithms:master Oct 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants