Skip to content

refactor: Enhance docs, add more tests in JohnsonsAlgorithm #5964

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

Hardvan
Copy link
Contributor

@Hardvan Hardvan commented Oct 24, 2024

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized it.
  • All filenames are in PascalCase.
  • All functions and variable names follow Java naming conventions.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in their comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanations.
  • All new code is formatted with clang-format -i --style=file path/to/your/file.java

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.43%. Comparing base (be0b1d5) to head (4ec3406).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #5964   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     67.43%   67.43%           
  Complexity     4578     4578           
=========================================
  Files           620      620           
  Lines         17147    17147           
  Branches       3312     3312           
=========================================
  Hits          11563    11563           
  Misses         5138     5138           
  Partials        446      446           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Hardvan Hardvan marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2024 05:00
@siriak siriak merged commit 1b51e3e into TheAlgorithms:master Oct 24, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants