Skip to content

Improve power sum algorithm #5652

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024
Merged

Improve power sum algorithm #5652

merged 9 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

manishraj27
Copy link
Contributor

@manishraj27 manishraj27 commented Oct 8, 2024

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized it.
  • All filenames are in PascalCase.
  • All functions and variable names follow Java naming conventions.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in their comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanations.
  • All new code is formatted with clang-format -i --style=file path/to/your/file.java

Description

The PowerSum class has been refactored to enhance clarity, readability, and functionality while preserving its original purpose. The goal of the class remains to find the number of ways to express a given integer ( N ) as the sum of unique natural numbers raised to the power of ( X ).

Key Changes:

  1. Method Renaming:

    • The sum method has been renamed to sumRecursive to better convey its purpose as a recursive helper function.
  2. Parameters Renamed:

    • Parameters in the powSum method have been renamed to targetSum and power for better readability and understanding.
  3. Special Case Handling:

    • A special case has been added to handle the scenario where both targetSum and power are zero. This is addressed by returning 1, which is based on the convention that there is one way to sum to zero (by using nothing).
  4. Code Clarity:

    • Introduced more descriptive variable names and added comments to clarify the purpose of each section of the code. This improves the maintainability and readability of the code.
  5. Single Recursive Function:

    • The recursive logic has been consolidated into a single method, which simplifies the flow and reduces code duplication.
  6. Simplified Logic:

    • The method now calculates the new sum upfront, which eliminates redundant calls and enhances performance.

Overall Impact:

These changes not only improve the code's readability but also make it more intuitive for other developers to understand its functionality. The refactored code maintains the same algorithmic complexity while offering a clearer structure and better handling of edge cases.

Hacktoberfest

I would like to submit this pull request as part of Hacktoberfest. I believe this contribution meets the quality standards for the event and would appreciate if it could be considered for acceptance under Hacktoberfest-Accepted label.

manishraj27 and others added 2 commits October 8, 2024 13:11
This commit enhances the PowerSum class in the backtracking package. The changes focus on improving code quality, readability, and documentation. Key improvements include:

1. Enhanced code structure and efficiency:
   - Removed class-level variables for better thread safety
   - Optimized the recursive approach to avoid unnecessary calculations
   - Simplified the overall logic for easier understanding

2. Improved readability:
   - Used more descriptive variable names (e.g., 'targetSum' instead of 'n', 'power' instead of 'x')
   - Enhanced method structure with a private recursive helper method

3. Better documentation:
   - Added comprehensive JavaDoc comments explaining the algorithm's purpose and implementation
   - Clarified the meaning of parameters, especially relating them to the original problem statement (N and X)
   - Improved inline comments for better code understanding

4. Adhered to Java best practices:
   - Improved encapsulation by making the recursive method private
   - Used Math.pow() directly instead of a custom power method

5. Maintained core functionality:
   - The algorithm still solves the same problem as before, but with improved code quality
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 8, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.88889% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 58.57%. Comparing base (d437d58) to head (dc0244e).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../java/com/thealgorithms/backtracking/PowerSum.java 88.88% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #5652      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     58.59%   58.57%   -0.03%     
+ Complexity     3747     3746       -1     
============================================
  Files           553      553              
  Lines         15924    15918       -6     
  Branches       3029     3029              
============================================
- Hits           9331     9324       -7     
  Misses         6196     6196              
- Partials        397      398       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@BamaCharanChhandogi BamaCharanChhandogi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks.

@BamaCharanChhandogi BamaCharanChhandogi merged commit f3b2a94 into TheAlgorithms:master Oct 8, 2024
6 checks passed
@manishraj27
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank You for accepting my PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants