Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 24, 2020. It is now read-only.

Jit optgrowth.rst #39

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 17, 2018
Merged

Jit optgrowth.rst #39

merged 8 commits into from
Sep 17, 2018

Conversation

natashawatkins
Copy link
Member

  • Keeps wanting to add an edit to python_essentials - which I guess is correct. I was working in the old directory when I started.

  • This is my proposed layout for the new jit lectures - one thing to consider is that the functions are more specific now, ie. T also include functional forms etc.

  • I think I need to edit the docstring on the lg model as it no longer contains the functional forms for f and u

@natashawatkins natashawatkins merged commit 5801f28 into master Sep 17, 2018
@natashawatkins natashawatkins deleted the jit-optgrowth2 branch September 17, 2018 17:53
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ Recall that Python maintains a concept of the present working directory (pwd) th

If a path is not specified, then this is where Python writes to

We can also use Python to read the contents of ``newline.txt`` as follows
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hey @natashawatkins can you please keep lectures in separate PRs. Thanks

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah sorry I couldn't figure out how to reverse this

@@ -330,7 +330,31 @@ function

In our setting, we have the following key result

*A feasible consumption policy is optimal if and only if it is* :math:`v^*`-*greedy*
* A feasible consumption policy is optimal if and only import numpy as np
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@natashawatkins this looks like an error here. This code should be in a code-block

@mmcky mmcky restored the jit-optgrowth2 branch September 20, 2018 06:41
@mmcky mmcky mentioned this pull request Sep 20, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants