Skip to content

Replaced the incorrect link in FAQ section of pyOpenMS documentation #469

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Mar 28, 2025

Conversation

DineshNehra29
Copy link
Contributor

@DineshNehra29 DineshNehra29 commented Mar 25, 2025

Fixes #468

This PR fixes a broken link in the FAQ section of the PyOpenMS documentation. The previous link was incorrect, leading to a 404 error. The updated link now correctly points to the relevant resource.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the FAQ hyperlink for wrapping new classes to point directly to the official online documentation, enhancing user accessibility.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 25, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the hyperlink in the FAQ section of the user guide. The change replaces an internal anchor link with a direct external URL pointing to a specific release version of the pyOpenMS documentation. There are no changes to any exported or public entities.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/source/user_guide/faq.rst Replaced a local anchor link with a direct external URL to the pyOpenMS documentation for wrapping classes.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Fix broken link in FAQ section (468)

Suggested reviewers

  • jpfeuffer

Poem

In the land of docs, I hop with glee,
A tiny change brings clarity, you see.
From local ties to links that shine,
My whiskers twitch at each design!
Hoppy trails and URLs so fine! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5e46f9f and a500683.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/source/user_guide/faq.rst (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs/source/user_guide/faq.rst
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build-test

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jpfeuffer
Copy link
Contributor

This doesn't look right.
It should either be a correct internal link or an external link to another resource.

But definitely NOT a link to another version of the docs!

@DineshNehra29
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jpfeuffer I've updated the link to use the correct internal reference as per the documentation structure. It now properly points to the relevant section in wrapping_workflows_new_classes.rst, and I've verified that it works correctly in the generated HTML. Let me know if any further changes are needed. Thanks for the feedback!

@jpfeuffer jpfeuffer merged commit cd3aa3b into OpenMS:master Mar 28, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Broken link in "Frequently Asked Questions" section in pyOpenMS documentation.
2 participants