Skip to content

Break CLI process when Node is not supported #2320

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2016

Conversation

rosen-vladimirov
Copy link
Contributor

@rosen-vladimirov rosen-vladimirov commented Dec 5, 2016

NOTE: Merge only after telerik/mobile-cli-lib#851 is merged
EDIT: PR in common is merged, this one can be merged.

As old versions of Node.js cannot be used anymore (after transpiling to ES6), we should break the process when such case happens.
Use only var instead of let, const, as only var keyword is supported in Node.js 0.10.x

Part of #2204

@rosen-vladimirov rosen-vladimirov self-assigned this Dec 5, 2016
@rosen-vladimirov rosen-vladimirov changed the title Break CLI process when Node is not supported [includes common lib update, do not merge yet]] Break CLI process when Node is not supported [includes common lib update, do not merge yet] Dec 5, 2016
As old versions of Node.js cannot be used anymore (after transpiling to ES6), we should break the process when such case happens.
Use only var instead of let, const, as only var keyword is supported in Node.js 0.10.x
@rosen-vladimirov rosen-vladimirov force-pushed the vladimirov/strict-node-ver branch from c2aca12 to 93a9c88 Compare December 6, 2016 09:48
@rosen-vladimirov rosen-vladimirov changed the title Break CLI process when Node is not supported [includes common lib update, do not merge yet] Break CLI process when Node is not supported Dec 6, 2016
@rosen-vladimirov rosen-vladimirov merged commit 2addc27 into master Dec 6, 2016
@rosen-vladimirov rosen-vladimirov deleted the vladimirov/strict-node-ver branch December 6, 2016 11:10
@pkoleva pkoleva added this to the 2.5.0 milestone Jan 4, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants