Why `self-closing-comp` allows empty divs?

[alex35mil]

I noticed that self-closing-comp doesn't report empty divs (eg <div></div>). Is there any particular reason that it allows empty html tags? Or it's valid b/c it's valid html?

[ljharb]

Seems like a bug to me. That should be <div />.

[alex35mil]

@ljharb I'd be sure it is, if there wasn't this in the doc:

[ljharb]

That doesn't make much sense to me - but if it's documented, then it's not a bug.

However, I'd love to see an option added to this rule that requires self-closing tags for every kind of tag, including HTML tags. @yannickcr?

[yannickcr]

This is the intended behavior. This rule only enforce empty React Components to be self-closed, and HTML tags are not concerned.

I think we could modify this rule to check all type of tags by default, then add some options to filter by type (components and/or HTML tags) if needed.

It seems to be the more logical behavior to me, but it will be a breaking change.

[ljharb]

Airbnb's React styleguide requires every empty element to be self-closed.

Alternatively, we could add an option in a minor version, and then flip the default behavior later, in a major?

[gitim]

Have the same issue. Is anybody already working on it? If not I'll prepare a pull request, which will add the option suggested by @ljharb and @yannickcr to the rule.

[GeoffGodwin]

Just wanted to leave my comment in here for future developers reaching this page. <div/> is not a valid HTML 4.x tag. It's the only base HTML tag (that I know of) that cannot be legally self-closing. If you use a <div/> it can cause very strange issues that can bubble up through a variety of frameworks (looking at you jQuery) making it difficult to trace as it does not throw distinct errors. One particular example being in IE8 where it breaks the DOM tree fairly silently.

It is always better practice to use <div></div> even if no content exists between the tags.

As a note, <div/> is legitimate XHTML 1.x. However for the sake of compatibility across browsers and versions there is no reason to use it.

I realize this is ooooold world HTML but it's still very valid today. Cheers!

[ljharb]

jsx isn’t quite html.