Updated Ember docs links to current version (#641)

Author: zamoore

src/v2/guide/comparison.md

@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ Angular 2's learning curve is much steeper. Even without TypeScript, their [Quic
 
 Ember is a full-featured framework that is designed to be highly opinionated. It provides a lot of established conventions and once you are familiar enough with them, it can make you very productive. However, it also means the learning curve is high and flexibility suffers. It's a trade-off when you try to pick between an opinionated framework and a library with a loosely coupled set of tools that work together. The latter gives you more freedom but also requires you to make more architectural decisions.
 
-That said, it would probably make a better comparison between Vue core and Ember's [templating](https://guides.emberjs.com/v2.7.0/templates/handlebars-basics/) and [object model](https://guides.emberjs.com/v2.7.0/object-model/) layers:
+That said, it would probably make a better comparison between Vue core and Ember's [templating](https://guides.emberjs.com/v2.10.0/templates/handlebars-basics/) and [object model](https://guides.emberjs.com/v2.10.0/object-model/) layers:
 
 - Vue provides unobtrusive reactivity on plain JavaScript objects and fully automatic computed properties. In Ember, you need to wrap everything in Ember Objects and manually declare dependencies for computed properties.