Skip to content

Import MuraxSoC as a VtR benchmark #584

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
mithro opened this issue May 17, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Import MuraxSoC as a VtR benchmark #584

mithro opened this issue May 17, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@mithro
Copy link
Contributor

mithro commented May 17, 2019

The SymbiFlow project is using MuraxSoC. This is the VexRISC-V configured as a "Cortex M0" style 32bit RISC-V processor + supporting infrastructure (XIP SPI controller, UART, etc).

The SymbiFlow Architecture Definitions repository is already running PicoSoC through VtR with our own architecture files both for Xilinx Series 7 and Lattice iCE40. You can find a copy of the exact things we are testing here.

It would be good if this benchmark was included in the normal VtR benchmarks.

@mithro
Copy link
Contributor Author

mithro commented May 17, 2019

FYI - @acomodi - Do you want to take this on, or is it better for @vaughnbetz to get one of his students to look at this?

@mithro mithro mentioned this issue May 17, 2019
7 tasks
@mithro
Copy link
Contributor Author

mithro commented May 17, 2019

One potential issue is that most benchmarks in VtR are using ODIN-II, while SymbiFlow uses Yosys.

@vaughnbetz
Copy link
Contributor

Adding @suyang5 to this discussion too. My comments are the same as on the earlier benchmark.

Copy link

This issue has been inactive for a year and has been marked as stale. It will be closed in 15 days if it continues to be stale. If you believe this is still an issue, please add a comment.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Apr 30, 2025
Copy link

This issue has been marked stale for 15 days and has been automatically closed.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants