You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 13, 2025. It is now read-only.
Not sure if this is possible, but I'd rather add Topcoder X as a member of the repo group than have it act as me.
Steps to Reproduce
Had an existing issue, with a member assigned, but wanted to try out Topcoder X
Added project in Topcoder X, clicked the buttons to add labels and add webhook
Went into Gitlab, removed the old labels I was using for BUG BASH, and added the Assigned label
Topcoder X messaged the assigned user that they need to sign up for TCX (Topcoder-X signup link in comments #39 ) but all messages were sent as rootelement, which confused the member.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
operating a dedicated TC user would be a security concern as that means 1 exploitable user could gain access to all client repos instead of the client user explicitly granting revokable access to the repo.
It would also be a permissioning nightmare to manage I think.
I concede.. I just wonder if then we should add a "This is an automated message for rootelement via Topcoder X" at the bottom of the comment or something... Like a signature that it's Topcoder X on behalf of the user.
Not sure if this is possible, but I'd rather add Topcoder X as a member of the repo group than have it act as me.
Steps to Reproduce
rootelement
, which confused the member.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: