Skip to content

Improve documentation #19

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
16 of 22 tasks
mpeyper opened this issue Mar 21, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed
16 of 22 tasks

Improve documentation #19

mpeyper opened this issue Mar 21, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
docs Changes to the documentation good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@mpeyper
Copy link
Member

mpeyper commented Mar 21, 2019

The example in the README is very basic (by design) but there have been numerous queries recently about more advanced usage so I think it's time we expand the documentation to cover these.

Initially, this could be part of the README, but I'd prefer keeping the README fairly light and having a docs directory that can explain features, concepts and techniques in more details (a .md file per topic).

We could look at generating a gitbook, docusaurus, docz or whatever the documentation site flavour of the month is from these docs at some point in the future (unless anyone want to set this up now).

Another thing that I am aware of (from experience 😞) is that docs written by the author are often not very useful to users (especially new users), as there is so much implied understanding that gets baked in. That's why I'm asking for help for others to write these docs. Include any gotchas or hiccups you hit along the way.

It doesn't have to be completely comprehensive from the get-go and we can improve and expand them as we go, so any and all contributions are welcome towards them.

Topics to cover:

There probably more that can also be included so feel free to go with want makes sense to you. I'm happy to update the checklist if you want to make suggestions in the comments here.

Note: I'm marking these off as we go, but that does not mean what is shown in the work-in-progress site as at all the final version and/or closed to improvements.

@mpeyper
Copy link
Member Author

mpeyper commented Apr 21, 2019

I've made a start on this. You can see the work-in-progress docs here. I decided to go with docz and so far it's been pretty great. netlify has also been pretty nice for the deployment of the site.

If you want to help and contribute some documentation, the branch is called better-docs.

@mpeyper
Copy link
Member Author

mpeyper commented Jun 26, 2019

These docs have been released as the official docs now, but still with some "coming soon" pages. I'll leave this open to track any improvements that we want to make to them.

There has also been a suggestion that the current theme (Docz dark theme) is not particularly readable (#107). I've been looking into it the theming for Docz looks a bit, but it's quite fiddly. I'm thinking about just switching to the light theme (in the short term?) or maybe looking at an alternative site generator (docusaurus looks pretty cool).

@mpeyper
Copy link
Member Author

mpeyper commented Aug 9, 2019

I'm closing this now as the docs have been switched back to the light theme and the "Coming soon" pages have been removed (analytics showed that they were very rarely (like < 5) hit. Happy if someone wants to add them back with some content, but I'm not going to worry.

@mpeyper mpeyper closed this as completed Aug 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Changes to the documentation good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant