Skip to content

Timer driven interrupts #104

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
Adminius opened this issue Sep 11, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Timer driven interrupts #104

Adminius opened this issue Sep 11, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question ❓ Usually converted as a discussion

Comments

@Adminius
Copy link
Contributor

Hey,
is something like this
https://github.com/rogerclarkmelbourne/Arduino_STM32/blob/master/STM32F1/libraries/A_STM32_Examples/examples/Maple/TimerInterrupts/TimerInterrupts.ino#L35
planned for this core?

@fpistm
Copy link
Member

fpistm commented Sep 11, 2017

Hi @Adminius,
it should be fine.
I though to extend Timer but I do not know when.
Any contribution are welcome. ;)
Currently next major steps planned for this core are the Low power management for Lx series and ADC modes which will be extended.

@Adminius
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok thx, @fpistm . i can wait. I will also try to adopt it, but i'm not sure whether I can manage it :(
Low power sounds good 👍, but BluePill support is more impotant (at least for me)...

@fpistm
Copy link
Member

fpistm commented Sep 11, 2017

I know I'm always working on BP integration...

@fpistm fpistm added enhancement New feature or request question ❓ Usually converted as a discussion labels Sep 11, 2017
@fpistm
Copy link
Member

fpistm commented Nov 7, 2017

Will be covered by #146

@fpistm fpistm closed this as completed Nov 7, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question ❓ Usually converted as a discussion
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants