Skip to content

Refine QuerydslRepositoryInvokerAdapter nullability assertions #1501

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
spring-projects-issues opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Refine QuerydslRepositoryInvokerAdapter nullability assertions #1501

spring-projects-issues opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees
@mp911de
Labels
type: task A general task
Milestone
3.1 M3 (2023.0.0)

Comments

@spring-projects-issues
Copy link

Oliver Drotbohm opened DATACMNS-1055 and commented

  • QuerydslRepositoryInvokerAdapter should reject null Predicate instances on construction and thus rather force clients to not create an instance in the first place
  • QuerydslPredicateBuilder.getPredicate(…) should return Optional<Predicate>

Referenced from: pull request #294
@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added in: web Integration with Spring MVC type: task A general task labels Dec 30, 2020
@mp911de mp911de assigned mp911de and unassigned odrotbohm Feb 24, 2023
@mp911de mp911de removed the in: web Integration with Spring MVC label Feb 24, 2023
@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Feb 24, 2023

QuerydslPredicateBuilder.getPredicate(…) is no longer nullable, see #2396

@mp911de mp911de added this to the 3.1 M3 (2023.0.0) milestone Feb 24, 2023
@mp911de mp911de changed the title Java 8 improvements to QuerydslBindingsFactory and QuerydslRepositoryInvokerAdapter [DATACMNS-1055] Refine QuerydslRepositoryInvokerAdapter nullability assertions Feb 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mp911de mp911de

Labels
type: task A general task
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.1 M3 (2023.0.0)
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@odrotbohm @mp911de @spring-projects-issues