Skip to content

Feature Request: please add support for UBX-SEC-SIG #71

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
z3roco0l85 opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed

Feature Request: please add support for UBX-SEC-SIG #71

z3roco0l85 opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@z3roco0l85
Copy link

z3roco0l85 commented Feb 11, 2025

Hello,

In F9 HPG 1.51, jammingState (UBX-MON-RF) is deprecated in protocol versions that support UBX-SEC-SIG (version 0x02) and always reported as 0; instead jammingState in UBX-SEC-SIG should be monitored.

Could you add support for UBX-SEC-SIG in the library?

Thank you
Gabriele

@PaulZC
Copy link
Collaborator

PaulZC commented Feb 11, 2025

Hi @z3roco0l85 ,

I will change this into a Feature Request and will try and add it when time permits.

Until then, you could:

  • Use a custom command to poll UBX-SEC-SIG and read the jamState and spfState bits from Byte 1 manually
  • Add support for SEC-SIG yourself following the instructions. If you do, please send us a Pull Request. Thanks!

Best wishes,
Paul

@PaulZC PaulZC changed the title F9P Unsupported UBX-SEC-SIG Feature Request: please add support for UBX-SEC-SIG Feb 11, 2025
@PaulZC
Copy link
Collaborator

PaulZC commented Apr 3, 2025

Hi Gabriele (@z3roco0l85 ),

Apologies for the delay.

I have added support for SEC SIG in v3.1.9.

Commit: e0e61bb

Please see the new Callback_Example9_SEC_SIG for more details.

Best wishes,
Paul

@PaulZC PaulZC closed this as completed Apr 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants