You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When you go to the definition of a selector in an import statement, the IDE does not bring me to the definition of that symbol. I presume that is because the selectors are usually names or strings (at least this is the case in Scalac) and its support need to be special cased.
However, what I find surprising is that go to definition doesn't work for the prefix of the selector either (which is, I believe, a symbol). This seems to confirm that imports are not handled by the IDE, at all. I've tried all the imports in the TreePickler file with no luck.
I think handling them would be very beneficial 👍. I believe this is an IDE bug, so I'm labeling it as such.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When you go to the definition of a selector in an import statement, the IDE does not bring me to the definition of that symbol. I presume that is because the selectors are usually names or strings (at least this is the case in Scalac) and its support need to be special cased.
However, what I find surprising is that go to definition doesn't work for the prefix of the selector either (which is, I believe, a symbol). This seems to confirm that imports are not handled by the IDE, at all. I've tried all the imports in the
TreePickler
file with no luck.I think handling them would be very beneficial 👍. I believe this is an IDE bug, so I'm labeling it as such.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: