tweak

Author: SethTisue

minutes/_posts/2018-12-05-december-5-2018.md

@@ -282,11 +282,6 @@ cross-compile and/or cross-consume between Scala 2 and 3, but he sees
 producing this as primarily LAMP's and Lightbend's job, rather than
 primarily the Scala Center's job.
 
-Some complex discussion about macros and the overall compatibility
-followed, difficult to summarize.  It's clear that library authors and
-users will need guidance to understand what will or won't work in what
-scenarios, and when it matters how macros are involved.
-
 Seb explained some the motivation for valuing forward compatibility,
 as he sees it, though "not taking sides". He explained, "If we only
 support 3 depends on 2, but not the other way around, then library
@@ -299,6 +294,15 @@ of the users he talks to who are worried about Scala 3 are worried
 about slow adoption, but then the forward-compatibility part of
 SCP-018 strongly reassures them.
 
+Some complex discussion about macros and the overall compatibility
+followed, difficult to summarize.  The key point is that neither
+forward compatibility nor backwards compatibility provide macros
+that work across both Scala 2 and Scala 3.
+
+It's clear that library authors and users will need guidance to
+understand what will or won't work in what scenarios, and when it
+matters how macros are involved.
+
 Jon noted that even if SCP-019 isn't accepted, that doesn't close the
 door on other future proposals aimed at refining SCP-018, as the
 overall Scala 3 situation develops further.