We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
1 parent f3dfdd4 commit c7b06d4Copy full SHA for c7b06d4
blog/_posts/2016-12-07-implicit-function-types.md
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ in which some piece of code is run. I believe they will deeply
360
influence the way we write Scala in the future. They are very powerful
361
abstractions, in the sense that just declaring a type of a function
362
will inject certain implicit values into the scope of the function's
363
-implementation. A lot of use cases can profit from this power to
+implementation. Many use cases can profit from this power to
364
eliminate boilerplate and make code clearer. Can this be abused,
365
making code more obscure? Absolutely, like every other powerful
366
abstraction technique. To keep your code sane, please keep the
0 commit comments