Skip to content

Commit 60cfc57

Browse files
Merge pull request #446 from jvican/blog/summary-submission
Add blog post July 13th SIP meeting
2 parents 6b2fe5a + 364ff75 commit 60cfc57

File tree

1 file changed

+59
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+59
-0
lines changed
Lines changed: 59 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
1+
---
2+
layout: blog
3+
post-type: blog
4+
by: Jorge Vicente Cantero
5+
title: "SIP Meeting Results: 2 SIPs Numbered and 3 SIPs Updated"
6+
---
7+
8+
Last week, the Scala Center ran its first SIP meeting under the [newly reformed SIP
9+
process](http://docs.scala-lang.org/sips/sip-submission.html), and we're happy
10+
to report that several SIPs saw long-awaited decisions made, or received
11+
detailed feedback from the SIP committee!
12+
13+
In the new SIP process, each SIP is assigned a reviewer, who must be someone
14+
sitting on the SIP committee. The reviewer's job is to carefully read and
15+
understand the SIP, and to present the SIP before the SIP committee. The
16+
reviewer must also present their analysis of the SIP to the committee, and then
17+
the floor is opened up for discussion on the SIP. An explicit goal of the new
18+
SIP process is for a decision and next steps to be determined for each SIP
19+
discussed.
20+
21+
The SIP committee went through five SIPs in the queue. Two new SIPs received a
22+
number, meaning they passed the first phase of acceptance – that is, the change
23+
to Scala is accepted in theory, so long as the the committee's design and
24+
implementation concerns can be adequately addressed in subsequent discussions on
25+
the SIP. The two SIPs which received numbers (first-round accepted) include:
26+
27+
* **[SIP-26 Unsigned Integer Data Types](https://github.com/scala/slip/pull/30)**, Reviewer: Martin Odersky ([review comments](https://github.com/scala/slip/pull/30#issuecomment-232399052))
28+
* **[SIP-27 Trailing Commas](https://github.com/scala/scala.github.com/pull/533)**, Reviewer: Eugene Burmako ([review comments](https://github.com/scala/scala.github.com/pull/533#issuecomment-232959066))
29+
30+
Two other passed their first iteration as proposed by [the new
31+
process](http://docs.scala-lang.org/sips/sip-submission.html):
32+
33+
* **[SIP-25 Trait Parameters](http://docs.scala-lang.org/sips/pending/trait-parameters.html)**, Reviewer: Adriaan Moors ([review comments](https://github.com/scala/scala.github.com/pull/428#issuecomment-233401911))
34+
* **[SIP-20 Improved Lazy Val Initialization](http://docs.scala-lang.org/sips/pending/improved-lazy-val-initialization.html)**, Reviewer: Sébastien Doeraene ([review comments](https://github.com/scala/scala.github.com/pull/206#issuecomment-232939781))
35+
36+
The final SIP discussed one was postponed at the request of the authors:
37+
38+
* **[SIP-22 Async](http://docs.scala-lang.org/sips/pending/async.html)**, Reviewer: Eugene Burmako
39+
40+
In the case of SIP-22, the authors will reopen it when they feel like taking up
41+
the proposal again, and addressing the issues they must look into next; in
42+
particular, figuring out how async/await can be used inside of a try/catch
43+
block.
44+
45+
Overall, we're happy to report that progress was made on a number of SIPs in the
46+
queue. In particular, we're excited that 2 SIPs received a first-phase of
47+
acceptance in receiving their numbers, and look forward to the addition of these
48+
proposals to Scala soon!
49+
50+
Next month, we will propose a reformed SLIP process focused on shaping this new
51+
notion of the Scala "platform," with a completely new committee, consisting of
52+
Scala community members. Keep an eye out for developments on the Scala library
53+
front this August!
54+
55+
Did you know that each month, we conduct our SIP meetings on-air? You can tune
56+
in and ask questions to the SIP committee, and have them answered live! You can
57+
even watch [past SIP meetings](https://plus.google.com/+ScalaProcess) at any
58+
time!
59+

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)