|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +layout: blog |
| 3 | +post-type: blog |
| 4 | +by: Jorge Vicente Cantero |
| 5 | +title: "SIP Meeting Results: 2 SIPs Numbered and 3 SIPs Updated" |
| 6 | +--- |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +Last week, the Scala Center ran its first SIP meeting under the [newly reformed SIP |
| 9 | +process](http://docs.scala-lang.org/sips/sip-submission.html), and we're happy |
| 10 | +to report that several SIPs saw long-awaited decisions made, or received |
| 11 | +detailed feedback from the SIP committee! |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +In the new SIP process, each SIP is assigned a reviewer, who must be someone |
| 14 | +sitting on the SIP committee. The reviewer's job is to carefully read and |
| 15 | +understand the SIP, and to present the SIP before the SIP committee. The |
| 16 | +reviewer must also present their analysis of the SIP to the committee, and then |
| 17 | +the floor is opened up for discussion on the SIP. An explicit goal of the new |
| 18 | +SIP process is for a decision and next steps to be determined for each SIP |
| 19 | +discussed. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +The SIP committee went through five SIPs in the queue. Two new SIPs received a |
| 22 | +number, meaning they passed the first phase of acceptance – that is, the change |
| 23 | +to Scala is accepted in theory, so long as the the committee's design and |
| 24 | +implementation concerns can be adequately addressed in subsequent discussions on |
| 25 | +the SIP. The two SIPs which received numbers (first-round accepted) include: |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +* **[SIP-26 Unsigned Integer Data Types](https://github.com/scala/slip/pull/30)**, Reviewer: Martin Odersky ([review comments](https://github.com/scala/slip/pull/30#issuecomment-232399052)) |
| 28 | +* **[SIP-27 Trailing Commas](https://github.com/scala/scala.github.com/pull/533)**, Reviewer: Eugene Burmako ([review comments](https://github.com/scala/scala.github.com/pull/533#issuecomment-232959066)) |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +Two other passed their first iteration as proposed by [the new |
| 31 | +process](http://docs.scala-lang.org/sips/sip-submission.html): |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +* **[SIP-25 Trait Parameters](http://docs.scala-lang.org/sips/pending/trait-parameters.html)**, Reviewer: Adriaan Moors ([review comments](https://github.com/scala/scala.github.com/pull/428#issuecomment-233401911)) |
| 34 | +* **[SIP-20 Improved Lazy Val Initialization](http://docs.scala-lang.org/sips/pending/improved-lazy-val-initialization.html)**, Reviewer: Sébastien Doeraene ([review comments](https://github.com/scala/scala.github.com/pull/206#issuecomment-232939781)) |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +The final SIP discussed one was postponed at the request of the authors: |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +* **[SIP-22 Async](http://docs.scala-lang.org/sips/pending/async.html)**, Reviewer: Eugene Burmako |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +In the case of SIP-22, the authors will reopen it when they feel like taking up |
| 41 | +the proposal again, and addressing the issues they must look into next; in |
| 42 | +particular, figuring out how async/await can be used inside of a try/catch |
| 43 | +block. |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +Overall, we're happy to report that progress was made on a number of SIPs in the |
| 46 | +queue. In particular, we're excited that 2 SIPs received a first-phase of |
| 47 | +acceptance in receiving their numbers, and look forward to the addition of these |
| 48 | +proposals to Scala soon! |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +Next month, we will propose a reformed SLIP process focused on shaping this new |
| 51 | +notion of the Scala "platform," with a completely new committee, consisting of |
| 52 | +Scala community members. Keep an eye out for developments on the Scala library |
| 53 | +front this August! |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +Did you know that each month, we conduct our SIP meetings on-air? You can tune |
| 56 | +in and ask questions to the SIP committee, and have them answered live! You can |
| 57 | +even watch [past SIP meetings](https://plus.google.com/+ScalaProcess) at any |
| 58 | +time! |
| 59 | + |
0 commit comments