SIP-27: Try & clarify the drawbacks of whole grammar trailing comma support

Author: dwijnand

sips/completed/_posts/2016-06-25-trailing-commas.md

@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ With this proposal I would like to present 2 variants:
 
 1. The first variant adds trailing comma support to only multi-line `ArgumentExprs`, `Params` and `ClassParams`, which I consider to be the parts of the grammar that would most benefit from trailing commas.
 
-2. The second variant adds trailing comma support to the whole grammar (again, only for multi-line), which means more consistency, but also supporting trailing commas in places that doesn't really need it, such as `ids`.
+2. The second variant adds trailing comma support to the whole grammar (again, only for multi-line), which means more consistency, but also supporting trailing commas in places that in practice don't really require it as much, such as `ids`.
 
 In this proposal, only the first variant is considered: trailing comma support for `ArgumentExprs`, `Params` and `ParamClasses` for the sake of simplicity.