completed sips

Author: darjutak

_sips/sips/2014-06-27-42.type.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ layout: sip
 discourse: true
 title: SIP-23 - Literal-based singleton types
 
-vote-status: pending
+vote-status: completed 
 permalink: /sips/:title.html
 ---
 

_sips/sips/2017-02-07-make-types-behave-like-expressions.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ layout: sip
 discourse: true
 title: SIP-33 - Match infix & prefix types to meet expression rules
 
-vote-status: pending
+vote-status: completed
 permalink: /sips/:title.html
 ---
 
@@ -207,10 +207,10 @@ type bad = 2 ~~ -2 //Error:(9, 20) ';' expected but integer literal found.
 type work_around = 2 ~~ (-2) //works for Typelevel scala, but fails in Dotty
 ```
 It is not yet clear if this is an implementation issue, or if the spec should be changed to allow this as well.
-If this is a spec change, then the committee should approve it also. 
-  
+If this is a spec change, then the committee should approve it also.
+
 #### Star `*` infix type interaction with repeated parameters  
-The [repeated argument symbol `*`](https://www.scala-lang.org/files/archive/spec/2.12/04-basic-declarations-and-definitions.html#repeated-parameters) may create confusion with the infix type `*`. 
+The [repeated argument symbol `*`](https://www.scala-lang.org/files/archive/spec/2.12/04-basic-declarations-and-definitions.html#repeated-parameters) may create confusion with the infix type `*`.
 Please note that this feature interaction already exists within the current specification.  
 
 ```scala