Skip to content

Switch from Travis CI to GHA? #940

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
JohnTitor opened this issue Nov 2, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1073
Closed

Switch from Travis CI to GHA? #940

JohnTitor opened this issue Nov 2, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1073

Comments

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

See https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/242791-t-infra/topic/RIP.20travis and https://blog.travis-ci.com/2020-11-02-travis-ci-new-billing :(

@rylev
Copy link
Member

rylev commented Dec 30, 2020

Would switching effect the number of runners that can be used by rust-lang/rust? I wasn't sure if runners were partitioned by org or by repo. I'd be happy to do this if people think it would be an improvement.

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member Author

@rylev IIRC the limit on the number of jobs is divided between rust-lang/rust and the rest (that's why we have the rust-lang-ci org), and the number is enough to use GHA here. There's no concern for a while so I think it's okay to go ahead, I'm happy to review a PR :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants