diff --git a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/rust-version b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/rust-version index eb779d9ab0509..6baf43397e881 100644 --- a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/rust-version +++ b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/rust-version @@ -1 +1 @@ -8536f201ffdb2c24925d7f9e87996d7dca93428b +493c38ba371929579fe136df26eccd9516347c7a diff --git a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/building/suggested.md b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/building/suggested.md index 506f41b165edb..43ff2ba726f91 100644 --- a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/building/suggested.md +++ b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/building/suggested.md @@ -123,6 +123,30 @@ Another way is without a plugin, and creating your own logic in your configuration. The following code will work for any checkout of rust-lang/rust (newer than Febuary 2025): ```lua +local function expand_config_variables(option) + local var_placeholders = { + ['${workspaceFolder}'] = function(_) + return vim.lsp.buf.list_workspace_folders()[1] + end, + } + + if type(option) == "table" then + local mt = getmetatable(option) + local result = {} + for k, v in pairs(option) do + result[expand_config_variables(k)] = expand_config_variables(v) + end + return setmetatable(result, mt) + end + if type(option) ~= "string" then + return option + end + local ret = option + for key, fn in pairs(var_placeholders) do + ret = ret:gsub(key, fn) + end + return ret +end lspconfig.rust_analyzer.setup { root_dir = function() local default = lspconfig.rust_analyzer.config_def.default_config.root_dir() @@ -142,7 +166,7 @@ lspconfig.rust_analyzer.setup { -- load rust-lang/rust settings local file = io.open(config) local json = vim.json.decode(file:read("*a")) - client.config.settings["rust-analyzer"] = json.lsp["rust-analyzer"].initialization_options + client.config.settings["rust-analyzer"] = expand_config_variables(json.lsp["rust-analyzer"].initialization_options) client.notify("workspace/didChangeConfiguration", { settings = client.config.settings }) end return true diff --git a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/contributing.md b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/contributing.md index 9817326f07ba9..09a7f912b9886 100644 --- a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/contributing.md +++ b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/contributing.md @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ smaller user-facing changes. into a PR that ends up not getting merged!** [See this document][mcpinfo] for more info on MCPs. -[mcpinfo]: https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html +[mcpinfo]: https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/proposals-and-stabilization.html#how-do-i-submit-an-mcp [zulip]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler ### Performance diff --git a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/implementing_new_features.md b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/implementing_new_features.md index fda38ef4fc01a..d7561bbbad22a 100644 --- a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/implementing_new_features.md +++ b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/implementing_new_features.md @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ like this; for example, the compiler team recommends filing a Major Change Proposal ([MCP][mcp]) as a lightweight way to garner support and feedback without requiring full consensus. -[mcp]: https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html#public-facing-changes-require-rfcbot-fcp +[mcp]: https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/proposals-and-stabilization.html#how-do-i-submit-an-mcp You don't need to have the implementation fully ready for r+ to propose an FCP, but it is generally a good idea to have at least a proof diff --git a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/tests/running.md b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/tests/running.md index ab97fbf965427..73c38736812a6 100644 --- a/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/tests/running.md +++ b/src/doc/rustc-dev-guide/src/tests/running.md @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ a subset of test collections, and merge queue CI will exercise all of the test collection. -```bash +```text ./x test ``` @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ tests. For example, a good "smoke test" that can be used after modifying rustc to see if things are generally working correctly would be to exercise the `ui` test suite ([`tests/ui`]): -```bash +```text ./x test tests/ui ``` @@ -53,14 +53,14 @@ Of course, the choice of test suites is somewhat arbitrary, and may not suit the task you are doing. For example, if you are hacking on debuginfo, you may be better off with the debuginfo test suite: -```bash +```text ./x test tests/debuginfo ``` If you only need to test a specific subdirectory of tests for any given test suite, you can pass that directory as a filter to `./x test`: -```bash +```text ./x test tests/ui/const-generics ``` @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ suite, you can pass that directory as a filter to `./x test`: Likewise, you can test a single file by passing its path: -```bash +```text ./x test tests/ui/const-generics/const-test.rs ``` @@ -81,19 +81,19 @@ Likewise, you can test a single file by passing its path: have to use the `--test-args` argument as described [below](#running-an-individual-test). -```bash +```text ./x test src/tools/miri --test-args tests/fail/uninit/padding-enum.rs ``` ### Run only the tidy script -```bash +```text ./x test tidy ``` ### Run tests on the standard library -```bash +```text ./x test --stage 0 library/std ``` @@ -102,13 +102,13 @@ crates, you have to specify those explicitly. ### Run the tidy script and tests on the standard library -```bash +```text ./x test --stage 0 tidy library/std ``` ### Run tests on the standard library using a stage 1 compiler -```bash +```text ./x test --stage 1 library/std ``` @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ the tests **usually** work fine with stage 1, there are some limitations. ### Run all tests using a stage 2 compiler -```bash +```text ./x test --stage 2 ``` @@ -134,13 +134,13 @@ You almost never need to do this; CI will run these tests for you. You may want to run unit tests on a specific file with following: -```bash +```text ./x test compiler/rustc_data_structures/src/thin_vec/tests.rs ``` But unfortunately, it's impossible. You should invoke the following instead: -```bash +```text ./x test compiler/rustc_data_structures/ --test-args thin_vec ``` @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ often the test they are trying to fix. As mentioned earlier, you may pass the full file path to achieve this, or alternatively one may invoke `x` with the `--test-args` option: -```bash +```text ./x test tests/ui --test-args issue-1234 ``` @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ When `--pass $mode` is passed, these tests will be forced to run under the given `$mode` unless the directive `//@ ignore-pass` exists in the test file. For example, you can run all the tests in `tests/ui` as `check-pass`: -```bash +```text ./x test tests/ui --pass check ``` @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ first look for expected output in `foo.polonius.stderr`, falling back to the usual `foo.stderr` if not found. The following will run the UI test suite in Polonius mode: -```bash +```text ./x test tests/ui --compare-mode=polonius ``` @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ just `.rs` files, so after [creating a rustup toolchain](../building/how-to-build-and-run.md#creating-a-rustup-toolchain), you can do something like: -```bash +```text rustc +stage1 tests/ui/issue-1234.rs ``` @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ execution* so be careful where it is used. To do this, first build `remote-test-server` for the remote machine, e.g. for RISC-V -```sh +```text ./x build src/tools/remote-test-server --target riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu ``` @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ On the remote machine, run the `remote-test-server` with the `--bind 0.0.0.0:12345` flag (and optionally `-v` for verbose output). Output should look like this: -```sh +```text $ ./remote-test-server -v --bind 0.0.0.0:12345 starting test server listening on 0.0.0.0:12345! @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ restrictive IP address when binding. You can test if the `remote-test-server` is working by connecting to it and sending `ping\n`. It should reply `pong`: -```sh +```text $ nc $REMOTE_IP 12345 ping pong @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ To run tests using the remote runner, set the `TEST_DEVICE_ADDR` environment variable then use `x` as usual. For example, to run `ui` tests for a RISC-V machine with the IP address `1.2.3.4` use -```sh +```text export TEST_DEVICE_ADDR="1.2.3.4:12345" ./x test tests/ui --target riscv64gc-unknown-linux-gnu ``` @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ export TEST_DEVICE_ADDR="1.2.3.4:12345" If `remote-test-server` was run with the verbose flag, output on the test machine may look something like -``` +```text [...] run "/tmp/work/test1007/a" run "/tmp/work/test1008/a" @@ -362,21 +362,21 @@ codegen-backends = ["llvm", "gcc"] Then you need to install libgccjit 12. For example with `apt`: -```bash -$ apt install libgccjit-12-dev +```text +apt install libgccjit-12-dev ``` Now you can run the following command: -```bash -$ ./x test compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc/ +```text +./x test compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc/ ``` If it cannot find the `.so` library (if you installed it with `apt` for example), you need to pass the library file path with `LIBRARY_PATH`: -```bash -$ LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12/ ./x test compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc/ +```text +LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12/ ./x test compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc/ ``` If you encounter bugs or problems, don't hesitate to open issues on the