Really fix backtick escaping

hdgarrood · hdgarrood · commit 1732fc5975aa · 2017-01-15T18:48:12.000Z
diff --git a/guides/Common-Operators.md b/guides/Common-Operators.md
@@ -56,4 +56,4 @@ Since JS just has one number type, it has to come up with a sensible way of hand
 
 If this is the behaviour you want in PureScript, you should use `%` from the `Math` module in `purescript-math`. Its type is `Number -> Number -> Number` and it simply delegates to the `%` operator in JS.
 
-However, PureScript's `Prelude` aims to provide a stronger theoretical foundation for common operators such as this one, which is why the `Prelude` exports a slightly different function, `mod :: forall a. EuclideanRing a => a -> a -> a`. For integers, `mod` works how you expect it to: `10 \`mod\` 3 == 1`, just as before. However, for Numbers, `mod` always returns 0. This may be surprising; however, the reason it works this way is that it is based upon a mathematical structure called a *Euclidean Ring*, whose definition requires this behaviour. For more info, see the [EuclideanRing documentation](https://pursuit.purescript.org/packages/purescript-prelude/2.1.0/docs/Data.EuclideanRing#t:EuclideanRing).
+However, PureScript's `Prelude` aims to provide a stronger theoretical foundation for common operators such as this one, which is why the `Prelude` exports a slightly different function, `mod :: forall a. EuclideanRing a => a -> a -> a`. For integers, `mod` works how you expect it to: ``10 `mod` 3 == 1``, just as before. However, for Numbers, `mod` always returns 0. This may be surprising; however, the reason it works this way is that it is based upon a mathematical structure called a *Euclidean Ring*, whose definition requires this behaviour. For more info, see the [EuclideanRing documentation](https://pursuit.purescript.org/packages/purescript-prelude/2.1.0/docs/Data.EuclideanRing#t:EuclideanRing).

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -56,4 +56,4 @@ Since JS just has one number type, it has to come up with a sensible way of hand`
`56`	`56`
`57`	`57`	If this is the behaviour you want in PureScript, you should use `%` from the `Math` module in `purescript-math`. Its type is `Number -> Number -> Number` and it simply delegates to the `%` operator in JS.
`58`	`58`
`59`		-However, PureScript's `Prelude` aims to provide a stronger theoretical foundation for common operators such as this one, which is why the `Prelude` exports a slightly different function, `mod :: forall a. EuclideanRing a => a -> a -> a`. For integers, `mod` works how you expect it to: `10 \`mod\` 3 == 1`, just as before. However, for Numbers, `mod` always returns 0. This may be surprising; however, the reason it works this way is that it is based upon a mathematical structure called a Euclidean Ring, whose definition requires this behaviour. For more info, see the [EuclideanRing documentation](https://pursuit.purescript.org/packages/purescript-prelude/2.1.0/docs/Data.EuclideanRing#t:EuclideanRing).
	`59`	+However, PureScript's `Prelude` aims to provide a stronger theoretical foundation for common operators such as this one, which is why the `Prelude` exports a slightly different function, `mod :: forall a. EuclideanRing a => a -> a -> a`. For integers, `mod` works how you expect it to: ``10 `mod` 3 == 1``, just as before. However, for Numbers, `mod` always returns 0. This may be surprising; however, the reason it works this way is that it is based upon a mathematical structure called a Euclidean Ring, whose definition requires this behaviour. For more info, see the [EuclideanRing documentation](https://pursuit.purescript.org/packages/purescript-prelude/2.1.0/docs/Data.EuclideanRing#t:EuclideanRing).