We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When executing commands, we are sanitizing the output
readthedocs.org/readthedocs/doc_builder/environments.py
Line 160 in 464f20e
Lines 206 to 210 in 464f20e
but lsremote depends on the output as is. This is a problem for repositories with a lot of branches/tags
ref https://sentry.io/organizations/read-the-docs/issues/3193177679/?alert_rule_id=229005&alert_timestamp=1649941826119&alert_type=email&environment=production&project=148442
We should exclude cutting the output from that command or do this "sanitation" just when saving the command.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Raised in chat: I had added this separate implementation of API requests for users that were hitting request limits:
https://github.com/readthedocs/readthedocs.org/blob/main/readthedocs/doc_builder/environments.py#L238-L255
It might be good to get that out of feature flag, or potentially feature flag the truncation for now with the same API_LARGE_DATA feature at least.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This seems duplicated of #8990
No branches or pull requests
When executing commands, we are sanitizing the output
readthedocs.org/readthedocs/doc_builder/environments.py
Line 160 in 464f20e
readthedocs.org/readthedocs/doc_builder/environments.py
Lines 206 to 210 in 464f20e
but lsremote depends on the output as is. This is a problem for repositories with a lot of branches/tags
ref https://sentry.io/organizations/read-the-docs/issues/3193177679/?alert_rule_id=229005&alert_timestamp=1649941826119&alert_type=email&environment=production&project=148442
We should exclude cutting the output from that command or do this "sanitation" just when saving the command.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: