Skip to content

Commit fc78711

Browse files
committed
Stick to SLF4J 1.7.x
And logback 1.2.x (for the test suite). Bumping SLF4J to 2.0 will require users to bump their bindings as well, making the upgrade a breaking change. Users are still free to include their own version of SLF4J. See https://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#changesInVersion200
1 parent cb4a80b commit fc78711

File tree

2 files changed

+12
-2
lines changed

2 files changed

+12
-2
lines changed

.github/dependabot.yml

+10
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@ updates:
1111
ignore:
1212
- dependency-name: "org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-servlet"
1313
versions: [ "[10.0,)" ]
14+
- dependency-name: "org.slf4j:slf4j-api"
15+
versions: [ "[2.0,)" ]
16+
- dependency-name: "ch.qos.logback:logback-classic"
17+
versions: [ "[1.3,)" ]
1418
- package-ecosystem: "maven"
1519
directory: "/"
1620
schedule:
@@ -20,3 +24,9 @@ updates:
2024
ignore:
2125
- dependency-name: "org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-servlet"
2226
versions: ["[10.0,)"]
27+
- dependency-name: "org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-servlet"
28+
versions: [ "[10.0,)" ]
29+
- dependency-name: "org.slf4j:slf4j-api"
30+
versions: [ "[2.0,)" ]
31+
- dependency-name: "ch.qos.logback:logback-classic"
32+
versions: [ "[1.3,)" ]

pom.xml

+2-2
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -54,12 +54,12 @@
5454
<project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
5555
<project.reporting.outputEncoding>UTF-8</project.reporting.outputEncoding>
5656

57-
<slf4j.version>2.0.0</slf4j.version>
57+
<slf4j.version>1.7.36</slf4j.version>
5858
<metrics.version>4.2.11</metrics.version>
5959
<micrometer.version>1.9.3</micrometer.version>
6060
<opentelemetry.version>1.17.0</opentelemetry.version>
6161
<jackson.version>2.13.3</jackson.version>
62-
<logback.version>1.4.0</logback.version>
62+
<logback.version>1.2.11</logback.version>
6363
<junit.version>4.13.2</junit.version>
6464
<mockito.version>4.7.0</mockito.version>
6565
<assertj.version>3.23.1</assertj.version>

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)