-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Start value doesn't work for Uniform distribution #2042
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I will have a peek at it. BTW, is there a reason you are creating an
directly in the model. |
Yes, it appears to happen for any variables that are auto-transformed prior to sampling (i.e. those not supported over the real line). |
I created an |
Just pushed a fix; please test. |
With your fix, I get this error in the previous example:
|
Sorry, closed the issue by mistake. |
Looks like that transform was missing from |
Actually, there is a problem with the interval transform in that the bounds of the transformation is not included in the name. Need to address this. |
OK, please test the updated PR. |
It works fine, thanks a lot! |
Ok, good. I want the PR to be reviewed before it is merged, as my solution is a bit hacky. |
same error here |
Fixed in master now. |
It looks like when a variable has a
Uniform
distribution, itsstart
value is ignored. This example shows thatalpha
never gets initialized to 5 when it has aUniform
distribution, but it does when it has aNormal
distribution.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: