Skip to content

Conditional vs interventional distributions #551

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
drbenvincent opened this issue Jul 1, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #552
Closed

Conditional vs interventional distributions #551

drbenvincent opened this issue Jul 1, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #552
Assignees
Labels
proposal New notebook proposal still up for discussion

Comments

@drbenvincent
Copy link
Contributor

drbenvincent commented Jul 1, 2023

Notebook proposal

Title: Conditional vs interventional distributions

Why should this notebook be added to pymc-examples?

We only have a small number of notebooks covering causal inference topics so far. Causal inference is gaining more and more attention, so showcasing that PyMC can deal with Bayesian Causal inference is important. This particular notebook compares the conditional and interventional distributions and showcases the amazing new do operator. This is currently in pymc-experimental but will soon be moved into the main pymc repo.

This notebook will not compare and contrast interventions and counterfactuals. This will be left for another notebook.

Suggested categories:

  • Level: beginner/intermediate
  • Diataxis type: explanation

Related notebooks

None. But it will join the few existing notebooks in the Causal Inference subsection

References

@drbenvincent drbenvincent added the proposal New notebook proposal still up for discussion label Jul 1, 2023
@drbenvincent drbenvincent self-assigned this Jul 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
proposal New notebook proposal still up for discussion
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant