Skip to content

Bayesian A/B testing #172

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
OriolAbril opened this issue Jun 9, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Bayesian A/B testing #172

OriolAbril opened this issue Jun 9, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
tracker id Issues used as trackers in the notebook update project, do not close!

Comments

@OriolAbril
Copy link
Member

File: https://github.com/pymc-devs/pymc-examples/blob/main/examples/case_studies/bayesian_ab_testing.ipynb
Reviewers: @tcuongd

The sections below may still be pending. If so, the issue is still available, it simply doesn't
have specific guidance yet. Please refer to this overview of updates

Notes

Exotic dependencies

Computing requirements

@OriolAbril OriolAbril added the tracker id Issues used as trackers in the notebook update project, do not close! label Jun 9, 2021
@OriolAbril
Copy link
Member Author

Hi @tcuongd I have tagged you to keep you up to date for when we update the notebook to work with PyMC3 4.0 at some point during the coming months, feel free to unsubscribe if not interested.

@tcuongd
Copy link

tcuongd commented Jun 9, 2021

Thank you! Definitely interested :)

@cuchoi
Copy link
Member

cuchoi commented Jun 4, 2022

@OriolAbril it seems that this issue should be moved to v4 after #351 ?

@OriolAbril
Copy link
Member Author

Yep, moved it to v4 auto. It is using v4 (I can't judge if already using best practices and taking advantage of all improvements) but it is definitely not following book style so we need to keep the issue open

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
tracker id Issues used as trackers in the notebook update project, do not close!
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants