-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 601
Documentation should specify the required unicode character encoding #214
Comments
Makes sense - Are you game to suggest a quick edit to /catalog to that effect? |
+1, and, to be more specific, that required encoding should be UTF-8 specifically, not just any of the encodings mentioned by the JSON spec |
Interesting! I had thought this was an unnecessary specification (I seem to recall writing that in response to a ticket here, many months ago), because I thought that UTF-8 was the only acceptable JSON encoding. I had no idea that UTF-16- and UTF-32 were permitted. |
@waldoj That's what I thought too. Thanks @philipashlock for upping our games! :) |
Oh, you sweet, innocent boy. ;) |
Just to be clear, then, this would take the form of clarification in the documentation of Project Open Data, not necc. in anything being needed in the public data listing itself, right? If so, does the following work and if not, would anyone be game to take a swing at it?
|
I've proposed #304 for this. |
#304 resolved this. |
The use of unicode for character encoding is part of the JSON standard with a strong emphasis on UTF-8.
This should be articulated in the documentation. Since this is part of the JSON standard, this could be described as part of the "Metadata File Format – JSON" section on schema.md but it might also make sense to mention in the JSON section or it's own section on catalog.md
cc: @Raseman
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: