Skip to content

CLN: More pytest idioms in pandas/tests/window #36657

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 30, 2020

Conversation

mroeschke
Copy link
Member

  • tests added / passed
  • passes black pandas
  • passes git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff

Removed some unused variables, added some fixtures for DataFrames used in test_pairwise.py, and utilize more pytest.mark.parameterize

@mroeschke mroeschke added Testing pandas testing functions or related to the test suite Window rolling, ewma, expanding Clean labels Sep 26, 2020
@mroeschke mroeschke added this to the 1.2 milestone Sep 26, 2020
@mroeschke mroeschke changed the title CLN: More pytest idioms to pandas/tests/window CLN: More pytest idioms in pandas/tests/window Sep 26, 2020
@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

havent looked through test_pairwise yet, but the other files all LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@jreback jreback left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. rebase just in case and merge on green (ex the arm build)

@mroeschke mroeschke merged commit 703838a into pandas-dev:master Sep 30, 2020
@mroeschke mroeschke deleted the cln/pytest_rolling_testes branch September 30, 2020 03:51
kesmit13 pushed a commit to kesmit13/pandas that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2020
* Clean test_timeseries_window

* CLN: More pytest idioms to pandas/tests/window

Co-authored-by: Matt Roeschke <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Clean Testing pandas testing functions or related to the test suite Window rolling, ewma, expanding
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants