-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
BUG: Numexpr engine - Name of the returned series dropped when using user function in DataFrame.eval
#58069
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Looks like this only happens when |
Thanks for pointing that out @asishm . It seems like that is closer to the issue, i.e., using |
DataFrame.eval
DataFrame.eval
I've updated the bug name and description, to reflect the fact that this is not directly os-dependent issue, but directly related to the used |
take |
take |
Just found out that this is actually duplicate of #10239 |
Closing as a duplicate of #10239 |
Pandas version checks
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the main branch of pandas.
Reproducible Example
Issue Description
When running with
numexpr
engine, the name of the returned series (sr
) isNone
even though it should befoo
in the first example andbaz
in the second. This creates discrepancies between usingmy_func(df['foo'])
anddf.eval('@my_func(foo)')
where the former preserves the correct name.Note that this is an issue when using
engine='numexpr'
only. Usingengine='python'
preserves thename
.Expected Behavior
Names of the series to be preserved (i.e.,
sr.name == "foo"
in the first case andsr.name == "baz"
in the second).Installed Versions
INSTALLED VERSIONS
commit : 2e218d1
python : 3.11.7.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Linux
OS-release : 6.6.13-1rodete3-amd64
Version : #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.6.13-1rodete3 (2024-03-04)
machine : x86_64
processor :
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : en_US.UTF-8
LOCALE : en_US.UTF-8
pandas : 1.5.3
numpy : 1.24.2
pytz : 2023.3.post1
dateutil : 2.8.2
setuptools : 68.1.2
pip : 23.3
Cython : 3.0.8
pytest : 7.4.4
hypothesis : None
sphinx : None
blosc : None
feather : None
xlsxwriter : None
lxml.etree : 5.1.0
html5lib : 1.1
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : None
jinja2 : 3.1.2
IPython : 8.20.0
pandas_datareader: None
bs4 : 4.12.3
bottleneck : 1.3.5
brotli : 1.1.0
fastparquet : None
fsspec : None
gcsfs : None
matplotlib : 3.6.3
numba : 0.57.1
numexpr : 2.9.0
odfpy : None
openpyxl : 3.1.2
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : None
pyreadstat : None
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : None
scipy : 1.10.1
snappy :
sqlalchemy : None
tables : 3.7.0
tabulate : None
xarray : None
xlrd : 2.0.1
xlwt : None
zstandard : None
tzdata : None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: