We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the main branch of pandas.
In [3]: DatetimeIndex(['2015-09-22 08:31:00', '2015-09-19 09:02:00','2015-09-19 14:14:00'], dtype='datetime64[s]').as_ ...: unit('s').max() Out[3]: Timestamp('1970-01-01 00:00:01')
should give '2015-09-19 14:14:00' Timestamp
commit : ad91ead python : 3.11.1.final.0 python-bits : 64 OS : Linux OS-release : 5.10.102.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 Version : #1 SMP Wed Mar 2 00:30:59 UTC 2022 machine : x86_64 processor : x86_64 byteorder : little LC_ALL : None LANG : en_GB.UTF-8 LOCALE : en_GB.UTF-8
pandas : 2.0.0.dev0+1157.gad91ead6de numpy : 1.25.0.dev0+363.gbb2769e12 pytz : 2022.7 dateutil : 2.8.2 setuptools : 65.7.0 pip : 22.3.1 Cython : 0.29.33 pytest : 7.2.0 hypothesis : 6.52.1 sphinx : None blosc : None feather : None xlsxwriter : None lxml.etree : None html5lib : None pymysql : None psycopg2 : None jinja2 : None IPython : 8.8.0 pandas_datareader: None bs4 : None bottleneck : None brotli : None fastparquet : None fsspec : None gcsfs : None matplotlib : None numba : None numexpr : None odfpy : None openpyxl : None pandas_gbq : None pyarrow : None pyreadstat : None pyxlsb : None s3fs : None scipy : None snappy : None sqlalchemy : None tables : None tabulate : None xarray : None xlrd : None zstandard : None tzdata : None qtpy : None pyqt5 : None None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
take
Sorry, something went wrong.
@jbrockmendel have you already started this? I'd just started a PR, but happy to let it go if you're already on it
go for it
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Pandas version checks
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the main branch of pandas.
Reproducible Example
Issue Description
should give '2015-09-19 14:14:00' Timestamp
Expected Behavior
should give '2015-09-19 14:14:00' Timestamp
Installed Versions
INSTALLED VERSIONS
commit : ad91ead
python : 3.11.1.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Linux
OS-release : 5.10.102.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2
Version : #1 SMP Wed Mar 2 00:30:59 UTC 2022
machine : x86_64
processor : x86_64
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : en_GB.UTF-8
LOCALE : en_GB.UTF-8
pandas : 2.0.0.dev0+1157.gad91ead6de
numpy : 1.25.0.dev0+363.gbb2769e12
pytz : 2022.7
dateutil : 2.8.2
setuptools : 65.7.0
pip : 22.3.1
Cython : 0.29.33
pytest : 7.2.0
hypothesis : 6.52.1
sphinx : None
blosc : None
feather : None
xlsxwriter : None
lxml.etree : None
html5lib : None
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : None
jinja2 : None
IPython : 8.8.0
pandas_datareader: None
bs4 : None
bottleneck : None
brotli : None
fastparquet : None
fsspec : None
gcsfs : None
matplotlib : None
numba : None
numexpr : None
odfpy : None
openpyxl : None
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : None
pyreadstat : None
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : None
scipy : None
snappy : None
sqlalchemy : None
tables : None
tabulate : None
xarray : None
xlrd : None
zstandard : None
tzdata : None
qtpy : None
pyqt5 : None
None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: