Skip to content

BUG: .max() gives wrong answer for non-nanosecond datetimeindex #50716

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
3 tasks done
MarcoGorelli opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #50719
Closed
3 tasks done

BUG: .max() gives wrong answer for non-nanosecond datetimeindex #50716

MarcoGorelli opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #50719
Labels
Bug Datetime Datetime data dtype Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution

Comments

@MarcoGorelli
Copy link
Member

Pandas version checks

  • I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.

  • I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.

  • I have confirmed this bug exists on the main branch of pandas.

Reproducible Example

In [3]: DatetimeIndex(['2015-09-22 08:31:00', '2015-09-19 09:02:00','2015-09-19 14:14:00'], dtype='datetime64[s]').as_
   ...: unit('s').max()
Out[3]: Timestamp('1970-01-01 00:00:01')

Issue Description

should give '2015-09-19 14:14:00' Timestamp

Expected Behavior

should give '2015-09-19 14:14:00' Timestamp

Installed Versions

INSTALLED VERSIONS

commit : ad91ead
python : 3.11.1.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Linux
OS-release : 5.10.102.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2
Version : #1 SMP Wed Mar 2 00:30:59 UTC 2022
machine : x86_64
processor : x86_64
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : en_GB.UTF-8
LOCALE : en_GB.UTF-8

pandas : 2.0.0.dev0+1157.gad91ead6de
numpy : 1.25.0.dev0+363.gbb2769e12
pytz : 2022.7
dateutil : 2.8.2
setuptools : 65.7.0
pip : 22.3.1
Cython : 0.29.33
pytest : 7.2.0
hypothesis : 6.52.1
sphinx : None
blosc : None
feather : None
xlsxwriter : None
lxml.etree : None
html5lib : None
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : None
jinja2 : None
IPython : 8.8.0
pandas_datareader: None
bs4 : None
bottleneck : None
brotli : None
fastparquet : None
fsspec : None
gcsfs : None
matplotlib : None
numba : None
numexpr : None
odfpy : None
openpyxl : None
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : None
pyreadstat : None
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : None
scipy : None
snappy : None
sqlalchemy : None
tables : None
tabulate : None
xarray : None
xlrd : None
zstandard : None
tzdata : None
qtpy : None
pyqt5 : None
None

@MarcoGorelli MarcoGorelli added Bug Datetime Datetime data dtype Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution labels Jan 12, 2023
@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

take

@MarcoGorelli
Copy link
Member Author

@jbrockmendel have you already started this? I'd just started a PR, but happy to let it go if you're already on it

@jbrockmendel
Copy link
Member

go for it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Datetime Datetime data dtype Non-Nano datetime64/timedelta64 with non-nanosecond resolution
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants